Evolutionary dating flaws

Even the use of isochron dating, which is supposed to eliminate some initial condition assumptions, produces dates that are not reliable.Despite the fact that there are many scientific problems with radiometric dating, there is a more significant problem.As discussed before, the assumptions influence the interpretation of the data.There are three main assumptions that must be made to accept radiometric dating methods.Furthermore, because his skull was found separated from his body, his body had probably not been buried deep beneath the soil, meaning his body was probably originally put in a shallow grave, near the river.However, scientists totally ignored these items and simply gave a single date as if the skeleton, on the day he died, had been wrapped in plastic, frozen and protected from all kinds of moisture, heat and light.

However, there are many methods that can be used to determine the age of the earth or other objects.

These must be accepted on faith in uniformitarian and naturalistic frameworks.

Recent research by a team of creation scientists known as the RATE (arth) group has demonstrated the unreliability of radiometric dating techniques.

Considering that modern dating methods are corrupted by known flaws in radiometric dating; by techniques which are known to be based on an assumption that the theory of evolution is a fact; and by other flawed techniques, it is clear that the dating of bones, fossils, etc. the issue cannot differentiate between the theory of evolution and creation science).

Knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming?

Leave a Reply